Opening

Across all eight courts

Data scope: these figures are computed from the reasoned written judgments the eight courts in this database have published on their own public portals. The set covers 1980 to 2026 and holds 45,000+ reported judgments.

These are not all the matters these courts handle. Courts dispose of a large volume of cases through procedural orders, adjournments, dismissals for non prosecution, withdrawals and short orders that are never authored as detailed written judgments. Only the reasoned judgments approved for publication are counted here.

What you are reading is the published precedent surface, not the total caseload. It is the same body of material an advocate would consult by hand when researching a matter, aggregated.

Constitutional Practice
Article 199
Article 199 is the most frequently cited Article of the Constitution, appearing in 4,000+ judgments, ahead of Article 4 at 800+.
Primary Citations
34.4% / 26.5%
34.4% of these judgments cite the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973. 26.5% cite the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860.
Length and Duration
6 pages, 1 yr
The median judgment runs 6 pages and about 1,700 words. The median gap between the year a matter was filed and the year judgment issued is about 1 year.
Bench Composition
64.8%
Of the judgments whose bench could be identified, 64.8% were authored by a single judge, 28.1% by a division bench and 7.2% by a full or larger bench.

Caseload composition by legal division

Caseload composition by legal division across 45,000+ reported judgments from all eight courts.

Most cited statutes

  1. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 27,000+
  2. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 20,000+
  3. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 18,000+
  4. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 13,000+
  5. Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 4,000+
  6. Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 2,000+
  7. Civil Servants Act, 1973 2,000+
  8. Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 2,000+
  9. Limitation Act, 1908 2,000+
  10. Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 1,000+
The statutes cited most often across these judgments.

Most frequent constitutional petition respondents

  1. Federation of Pakistan 2,000+
  2. Government of Balochistan 900+
  3. Province of Sindh & others 700+
  4. Province of Sindh 600+
  5. Police 300+
  6. Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) 200+
  7. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) 200+
  8. Government of Sindh 200+
  9. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 200+
  10. The State 100+
The entities most often named as respondent in a constitutional petition. Useful as a prior when settling the array of respondents in a fresh petition.

Judgment volume by year

Methodology. Judgments are captured from each court's own public portal. Statute names are canonicalised across stylistic variants before counting, so one Act cited six different ways counts as one Act. Constitutional article and Penal Code section frequencies are read from the cited statutes recorded against each judgment. Time from filing to judgment is the judgment year minus the filing year taken from the case number, a proxy that does not reflect docket level dates. Bench size is read from the bench recorded on each judgment, and judgments whose bench could not be identified are excluded from that percentage rather than counted as single judge. Recent years reflect publishing lag and are excluded from any trend statement. Figures last computed 2026-09-12.

By court

153 sitting judges across eight courts. Pick a court to read its bench and the statistics for its own published judgments.

Supreme Court of Pakistan

Source: supremecourt.gov.pk, read 2026-09-09 · 19 of 25 seats filled
# Name Designation
1 Justice Yahya Afridi Chief Justice
2 Justice Munib Akhtar Judge
3 Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail Judge
4 Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar Judge
5 Justice Ayesha Malik Judge
6 Justice Shahid Waheed Judge
7 Justice Irfan Saadat Khan Judge
8 Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan Judge
9 Justice Malik Shehzad Ahmed Khan Judge
10 Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi Judge
11 Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan Judge
12 Justice Muhammad Hashim Kakar Judge
13 Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui Judge
14 Justice Salahuddin Panhwar Judge
15 Justice Shakeel Ahmad Judge
16 Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim Judge
17 Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb Judge
18 Justice Khalid Masud Ad-hoc Judge
19 Justice Qibla Ayaz Ad-hoc Judge
1 Chief Justice
Justice Yahya Afridi
2 Judge
Justice Munib Akhtar
3 Judge
Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail
4 Judge
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
5 Judge
Justice Ayesha Malik
6 Judge
Justice Shahid Waheed
7 Judge
Justice Irfan Saadat Khan
8 Judge
Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan
9 Judge
Justice Malik Shehzad Ahmed Khan
10 Judge
Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
11 Judge
Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan
12 Judge
Justice Muhammad Hashim Kakar
13 Judge
Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui
14 Judge
Justice Salahuddin Panhwar
15 Judge
Justice Shakeel Ahmad
16 Judge
Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim
17 Judge
Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb
18 Ad-hoc Judge
Justice Khalid Masud
19 Ad-hoc Judge
Justice Qibla Ayaz

The Supreme Court's own site does not serve its roster to us, so this list is built from public reporting rather than from the Court's page, and every departure on it is separately dated: two judges resigned on 14 November 2025 and one retired on 8 August 2026. The two Ad-hoc Judges sit on the Shariat Appellate Bench. Since the Constitution (Twenty-Seventh Amendment) Act 2025 the Court's constitutional jurisdiction sits with the Federal Constitutional Court, and several judges moved there. Bench composition changes by administrative order and without advance notice, and a roster is a picture of one day. Elevations, transfers and retirements take effect before any portal is updated. Verify with the court's own registrar before relying on this for a cause list or a filing.

Data scope: these figures are computed from the reasoned written judgments the Supreme Court of Pakistan has published on its public portal at www.supremecourt.gov.pk. The set covers 1991 to 2026 and holds 3,700+ reported judgments.

These are not all the matters the Supreme Court of Pakistan handles. Courts dispose of a large volume of cases through procedural orders, adjournments, dismissals for non prosecution, withdrawals and short orders that are never authored as detailed written judgments. Only the reasoned judgments approved for publication are counted here.

What you are reading is the published precedent surface, not the total caseload. It is the same body of material an advocate would consult by hand when researching a matter, aggregated.

Constitutional Practice
Article 184
Article 184 is the most frequently cited Article of the Constitution, appearing in 10+ judgments, ahead of Article 185 at 10+.
Primary Citations
44.9% / 22.4%
44.9% of these judgments cite the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973. 22.4% cite the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860.
Length and Duration
6 pages, 1 yr
The median judgment runs 6 pages and about 1,900 words. The median gap between the year a matter was filed and the year judgment issued is about 1 year.
Bench Composition
1.5%
Of the judgments whose bench could be identified, 1.5% were authored by a single judge, 30.3% by a division bench and 68.2% by a full or larger bench.

Caseload composition by legal division

Caseload composition by legal division across 3,700+ reported judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

Most cited statutes

  1. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 1,000+
  2. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 900+
  3. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 800+
  4. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 500+
  5. Civil Servants Act, 1973 300+
  6. Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 200+
  7. Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 200+
  8. Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 100+
  9. Limitation Act, 1908 100+
  10. Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 100+
The statutes cited most often across these judgments.

Most frequent constitution petition respondents

  1. Federation of Pakistan 200+
  2. Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) 10+
  3. Capital Development Authority (CDA) 4
  4. Government of Pakistan 4
  5. The President of Pakistan, Pak Secretariat, Isl... 3
  6. Haris Steel Industries (Pvt) Ltd & others 3
  7. Federal Government through Secretary Ministry o... 3
  8. The State 2
  9. Pakistan Bar Council, through its Secretary, Is... 2
  10. The President of Pakistan 2
The entities most often named as respondent in a constitution petition. Useful as a prior when settling the array of respondents in a fresh petition.

Judgment volume by year

Methodology. Judgments are captured from each court's own public portal. Statute names are canonicalised across stylistic variants before counting, so one Act cited six different ways counts as one Act. Constitutional article and Penal Code section frequencies are read from the cited statutes recorded against each judgment. Time from filing to judgment is the judgment year minus the filing year taken from the case number, a proxy that does not reflect docket level dates. Bench size is read from the bench recorded on each judgment, and judgments whose bench could not be identified are excluded from that percentage rather than counted as single judge. Recent years reflect publishing lag and are excluded from any trend statement. Figures last computed 2026-09-12.